Quake Damage Claims Dismissed Over Previous Faults

3

The company behind the claim stated that the properties were impacted by a 5.4-magnitude earthquake that occurred in November 2018. Although the earthquake's epicenter was approximately 45 kilometers away from the buildings, Geoscience Australia specified the evident damage radius to be no more than 27 kilometers from the epicenter.

In their defense, the claimant's engineering expert conceded that the buildings were situated outside the primary damage zone but contended that the earthquake’s vibrations had unleashed energy beneath the geological formations on which the houses stood.

The expert identified "preexisting or dormant conditions" in the properties, including previously repaired damage which, according to him, reopened due to ground movement prompted by the quake, also leading to the manifestation of new fractures.

Meanwhile, Allianz, the insurance provider, enlisted a forensic civil and structural engineer who assessed the damages. His findings revealed brickwork fissures in multiple sections of one property, referred to as House H, and evident cracks within the garage of the second property, termed House P, in addition to a separation between a storeroom and the home.

The engineer hired by Allianz attributed the damage to prolonged foundation instability and deterioration of the mortar used in the brickwork, rather than to the seismic event.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer’s position, noting that both engineers corroborated the presence of damage similar to what was being contested even before the 2018 earthquake, specifically in House H.

AFCA further mentioned that updates made to certain rooms within the house remained unaffected, while external brickwork conditions pointed towards significant wear and tear, contributing to the losses. Comparable remarks were also made in regard to House P.

"While both experts agree it is conceivable for House H to incur earthquake-related damage under ideal conditions despite its location outside the designated impact radius, the insurer's expert refuted the existence of such conditions in this case," stated the adjudicator from AFCA.

"Even if the earthquake were recognized as being a proximate cause of the damage to House H, it would coexist with other excluded factors (wear and tear, prolonged structural movement)."

"Consequently, the insurer maintains the right to invoke those exclusions as a basis for denying the claim," AFCA concluded.

Published:Thursday, 1st Aug 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

NRMA's Departure from Farm Insurance: What It Means for Australian Farmers

05 Oct 2025: Paige Estritori

In a significant shift within the Australian insurance landscape, NRMA has announced its withdrawal from the farm insurance sector, ceasing the sale of new policies as of July 1, 2025. This decision leaves many farmers seeking reliable alternatives to safeguard their livelihoods. - read more

Diversification Drives New Insurance Needs for Australia's Small Farms

26 Sep 2025: Paige Estritori

In the evolving landscape of Australian agriculture, small commercial farms are increasingly diversifying their operations to enhance income and sustainability. This shift, while offering economic benefits, introduces new complexities in risk management and insurance coverage, presenting both challenges and opportunities for insurance brokers. - read more

Satellite Technology Revolutionizes Crop Insurance for Australian Farmers

26 Sep 2025: Paige Estritori

In a significant advancement for Australian agriculture, Insurance Facilitators (IF), a family-owned underwriting agency, has introduced a data-driven crop insurance solution leveraging satellite technology. This innovative approach aims to address longstanding challenges in the industry, including premium leakage and risk accumulation, by providing more accurate and efficient risk assessments. - read more

ASIC Takes Legal Action Against RACQ Insurance Over Misleading Premium Comparisons

25 Sep 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has initiated Federal Court proceedings against RACQ Insurance, a subsidiary of Insurance Australia Group (IAG), alleging that the insurer misled over 570,000 customers through deceptive premium comparison pricing in renewal notices issued between September 2019 and December 2024. - read more

Surge in Farm Impact-Related Claims Raises Safety Alarms

25 Sep 2025: Paige Estritori

WFI Insurance has reported a significant 44% increase in farm impact-related claims over the past year, marking the highest level in four years. This surge includes incidents such as vehicle crashes and crush injuries, with approximately 1,800 claims related to farm vehicle accidents, including those involving quad bikes and side-by-side vehicles (SSVs). Many of these incidents have resulted in severe injuries, including fractures and head trauma. - read more

Rising Insurance Premiums for Farm Machinery Amidst Increasing Extreme Weather Events

25 Sep 2025: Paige Estritori

Australian farmers are grappling with a significant rise in insurance premiums for farm machinery, driven by the increasing frequency and severity of extreme weather events. Some farmers have reported that their insurance bills have more than doubled over the past few years, with annual premiums exceeding $100,000. - read more

Click for more Insurance News