Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

WFI Insurance Highlights Significant Drop in Farm Liability Claims

30 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

WFI Insurance has reported a notable decrease in farm liability claims across most categories, signaling a positive trend in safety practices within the Australian agricultural sector. - read more

Australian Farmers Confront Rising Insurance Premiums Amid Climate Challenges

22 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

Australian farmers are currently grappling with a significant surge in insurance premiums, with increases ranging from 20% to 40%, depending on the insurer. This escalation is primarily driven by the rising frequency and severity of natural disasters, coupled with a contracting underwriter market and escalating costs of goods and services. - read more

Widespread Rural Crime Exposes NSW Farmers to Repeated Victimisation

22 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

A recent survey conducted by WFI Insurance in collaboration with the University of New England (UNE) Centre for Rural Criminology has unveiled alarming statistics regarding rural crime in New South Wales. The findings indicate that over 90% of NSW farmers have encountered criminal activities on their properties, with approximately 30% reporting being targeted seven or more times. - read more

Elders Insurance Highlights Increased Summer Storm Risks for Farmers

22 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

As the Australian summer approaches, Elders Insurance has issued a cautionary advisory to farmers, emphasising the heightened risk of storm-related damages during this season. Recent data indicates a significant increase in insurance claims due to summer storms, underscoring the need for proactive measures to safeguard agricultural assets. - read more

CGU and WFI Collaborate with Ag Guard to Boost Farm Insurance Services

14 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

In a significant development for Australia's agricultural sector, CGU and WFI Insurance have announced an exclusive partnership with Ag Guard, a technology-driven agricultural insurance agency. This collaboration, set to commence in June 2026, aims to bolster the agricultural insurance capabilities of both insurers and enhance digital services for brokers, partners, and customers. - read more

Insurance Council Declares Significant Events for Northern Territory and Queensland Floods

14 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) has declared two Significant Events in response to the severe rainfall and flooding that have recently impacted the Northern Territory and Queensland. This declaration pertains to the flooding in Katherine and surrounding regions in the Northern Territory, as well as the Bundaberg region and Burnett River catchment in Queensland. - read more

Click for more Insurance News