Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Rising Input Costs Squeeze Margins for Australian Dairy Farmers

09 May 2026: Paige Estritori

Australian dairy producers are entering the 2026/27 season with limited margin for error, as escalating input costs continue to erode profitability. According to Rabobank's latest annual Australian Dairy Outlook, rising expenses for fuel, fertiliser, water, labour, and interest rates are placing significant pressure on the sector. - read more

Federal Government Introduces $10 Billion Package to Secure Fuel and Fertiliser Supplies

09 May 2026: Paige Estritori

In response to escalating global disruptions affecting fuel and fertiliser supplies, the Australian government has announced a $10 billion budget package aimed at securing these critical inputs for the agricultural sector. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese emphasized the government's commitment to stabilizing supply lines and mitigating the impact of international conflicts on domestic agriculture. - read more

Queensland Farmers' Market Threatened with Eviction Over Insurance Dispute

01 May 2026: Paige Estritori

In south-east Queensland, the Three Creeks Farm Stall, a cherished farmers' market operating in Eileen Hose Park near Gympie, is confronting potential eviction due to a disagreement over public liability insurance requirements imposed by the Gympie Regional Council. - read more

Record Surge in Insurance Complaints Due to Claim Processing Delays

01 May 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent data from the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) reveals a significant increase in complaints against insurance companies, with an average of 100 complaints per day. This surge is primarily attributed to delays in processing everyday claims, affecting both home-building and motor vehicle insurance sectors. - read more

Climate Change Contributing to Rising Home Insurance Premiums in Australia

01 May 2026: Paige Estritori

Insurance Australia Group (IAG) has released a report indicating that climate change is increasingly influencing the rise in home insurance premiums across Australia. The report highlights that the frequency and severity of extreme weather events, such as severe storms and hailstorms, are escalating, particularly in densely populated regions. - read more

Queensland Farmers' Market Threatened with Eviction Over Insurance Dispute

23 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

In a developing situation in south-east Queensland, the Three Creeks Farm Stall, a popular farmers' market operating in Eileen Hose Park near Gympie, is facing potential eviction due to a dispute over public liability insurance requirements imposed by the Gympie Regional Council. - read more

Click for more Insurance News