Local Business Triumphs Over Insurer in Power Outage Dispute

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The wrangle ensued after the butcher, located in Ballina, NSW, suffered power loss during the notorious Northern Rivers floods in early March 2022. This critical blackout resulted in the spoilage of the business's refrigerated stock and cessation of operations.

QBE, the insurance company involved, assigned blame to the torrential flood, fortifying its stance with a hydrologist's account deeming the blackout as a probable ramification of the floods. The narrative was apparently supported by a communication from the electricity provider EE, which highlighted interruptions due to the dire flooding and consequential severe damages to the grid infrastructure.

Challenging this assertion, the aggrieved butcher presented an alternative sequence of events, highlighting an intentional power shutdown orchestrated by EE to maintain civic safety in anticipation of the floods, a singular detail casting doubt on the direct correlation between floodwater and power loss.

This perspective is endorsed by an assessment from the Australian Financial Complaints Authority, casting ambiguity on the initial claims of the energy deficit’s timing and contesting the clear association with the flood event. It recognized that the local network's 'de-energizing' aligned with numerous protective activities spanning from damage assessment to essential community safety precautions.

Moreover, the hydrologist’s conjecture, although initially an aspect of QBE's argument, lacked conviction and specificity. No electrical inquiry was conducted, thus adulterating the assertion that flood-induced blackout was the unequivocal cause of the outage.

In a backdrop of dynamic interpretations, EE’s contemporary accounts marginally united with the insurer's diagnosis but delivered granular details attributing to a more comprehensive, and less flood-focused, synopsis of proceedings.

Debates also kindled around QBE’s assertion over the content benefit of the insurance policy, which covered physical loss or damage but not the 'consequential loss' due to it, suggesting that additional coverage was mandatory to protect against knock-on effects. QBE's stance was that the refrigeration stock damage fell into the latter category. However, the butcher's contention, fortified by the authoritative panel, avers that there was no substantive basis for separating the stock from the core property within the context of this claim.

Concluding the dispute, the authority panel exposed inadequacies in the insurance company’s rationalizations. They reprimanded QBE’s failure to thoroughly elucidate its defense and vehemently supported the butcher's position that the spoilt inventory was indeed covered as direct physical loss. The claim, they decreed, was firmly nestled within the innate protective spectrum of the insurance policy's provisions.

Published:Thursday, 29th Feb 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Why Claims Disputes Should Prompt a Farm Insurance Review

19 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent complaints data from the Australian Financial Complaints Authority has again highlighted a pressure point that matters to rural Australia: insurance claims can become difficult when expectations, policy wording and evidence do not line up. While the figures cover the wider insurance market rather than farms alone, the themes are highly relevant for agricultural businesses dealing with storm damage, fire losses, machinery failures, fencing repairs or interrupted operations. - read more

Wetter Weather Forecast Puts Rural Cover Under the Microscope

12 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia's latest seasonal weather signals have again pushed rainfall risk into the foreground for rural and regional businesses. While conditions vary sharply between districts, a wetter outlook for parts of the country is a useful reminder that risk planning should not wait until paddocks are already saturated, creek crossings are cut or machinery is bogged at harvest. - read more

Underinsurance Warning Lands at a Critical Time for Farms

04 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori

Fresh insurance industry concern about underinsurance is especially relevant for Australian farmers as rebuilding and replacement costs remain stubbornly high. While the issue is often discussed in relation to houses, the same pressure applies across rural assets: sheds, fencing, pumps, tanks, grain storage, livestock yards, irrigation equipment and machinery can all cost significantly more to replace than they did when a policy was first arranged. - read more

Why Climate Risk Is Back on the Farm Insurance Agenda

28 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia's general insurance sector has again put natural hazard resilience at the centre of the affordability debate, with fresh industry commentary warning that floods, bushfires, storms and cyclones are continuing to reshape how risk is priced. For farmers, this is not an abstract policy discussion. It goes directly to the cost and availability of farm insurance, particularly for properties with older buildings, exposed machinery, flood-prone access roads, boundary fencing, stored fodder or high-value livestock. - read more

What Allianz’s Farm Cover Revamp Means for Farmers

21 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Allianz Australia has refreshed its farm pack insurance, with the updated product announced on 20 July 2026. For farmers and rural property owners, the significance is less about one insurer changing a product and more about what it signals across the broader farm insurance market: insurers are trying to make cover easier to understand while adjusting policy features to better match modern farming operations. - read more

What Bushfire Resilience Ratings Mean for Farmers

07 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

More Australian insurers are now recognising household bushfire resilience ratings, a development rural and regional property owners should watch closely as risk-based pricing becomes more visible across the insurance market. NAB and CommBank insurance brands have joined the program, alongside existing participants including NRMA Insurance and Suncorp, meaning a significant share of the home insurance market is now engaging with assessed bushfire mitigation. - read more

Click for more Insurance News