Victorian Court Sets Legal Cost Boundaries in IAG Class Action Suit

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

Justice Nichols highlighted that the approved group costs order, which encapsulates GST, presents a safeguard for plaintiffs by securing a definitive portion of the settlements. This structure notably lessens the financial risks plaintiffs undertake, as their compensation remains insulated from disproportionate legal fees. This fixed fee measure is especially appealing given the unpredictable and often extensive legal costs that come with protracted class action battles.

Representing the group members, Damian Norris filed the application for the group costs order, a modality that spells out the legal reimbursement to the attorneys that is bound to a fixed percentage of the settlement figure. Particularly for this case, the issue at hand was IAG's alleged misuse of outdated Quarantine Act wordings in its business interruption policies, which did not account for COVID-19 related claims – a significant oversight leading to investor loss.

The order has resonated within legal confines of the financial industry, indicating IAG's peripheral involvement with the matter. While IAG showed a neutral stance towards the costs order application, their primary focus remains on confronting the accusations of misleading conduct and inadequate informative disclosure, as claimed by the litigants.

In the intricate dance of legal actions, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan orchestrates the motion against IAG, lodged back in 2022, with the insurer resolute in contesting the allegations. Drawn under the scrutiny are claims that IAG misrepresented its financial position and failed to uphold continuous disclosure guidelines, potentially inflating its share value and leading stakeholders to err in their investment decisions between March 11 and November 20, 2020.

This legal development signals a shift towards increased equity and fairness for the claimants embroiled in class actions. Moreover, it promotes the efficient deployment of legal resources and stands as a deterrent to unnecessary escalation in legal fees. The class action encompasses those investors who engaged with the market within the specified period, and as the proceedings unravel, the ruling sets a precedent on managing costs in collective legal pursuits.

Published:Friday, 1st Mar 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Farm Package Revamp Signals a More Digital Insurance Market

11 Nov 2026: Paige Estritori

Prevail’s latest farm insurance update is a useful signpost for Australian primary producers watching how the rural insurance market is changing. Insurance News reported on 5 November 2026 that the Steadfast-owned underwriting agency has refreshed its farm package, now branded Prevail Elite Farm Insurance, with a clearer structure, higher stated capacity across some farm assets and new attention on technology-related exposures. - read more

New Dust Limits Put Farm Safety Records in the Insurance Spotlight

04 Nov 2026: Paige Estritori

New workplace exposure limits for airborne contaminants are moving from a regulatory issue to a practical farm risk-management concern, particularly for grain growers heading through harvest. With the national transition scheduled for 1 December 2026, recent state decisions to delay or stage some limits have created a patchwork of obligations that farm businesses should watch closely. - read more

Farm Flood Dispute Shows the Cost of Delayed Claims Handling

28 Oct 2026: Paige Estritori

A recent Australian Financial Complaints Authority determination involving a flooded farmhouse has put claims handling back under the microscope for rural policyholders, after the insurer was ordered to pay almost $432,000 across building repairs, additional temporary accommodation, professional costs and compensation for non-financial loss. The decision, dated 27 August 2026 and reported by Insurance News on 15 October 2026, is a useful reminder that the practical aftermath of a farm flood can extend well beyond the first clean-up. - read more

What Cyclone Alfred Recovery Teaches Farmers About Insurance

16 Sep 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent industry attention on insurance claims linked to ex-Tropical Cyclone Alfred is a timely reminder that severe weather losses rarely stop at damaged buildings. For farms across storm and flood-exposed regions, the real cost of an event can include cut access roads, damaged fencing, spoiled fodder, machinery downtime, livestock movement issues and weeks of operational disruption. - read more

Seasonal Bushfire Risk Puts Farm Cover Back in the Spotlight

09 Sep 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia’s latest seasonal bushfire outlook is a practical reminder that fire risk is not confined to the height of summer. For many farms, the exposure begins well before a catastrophic fire day is declared, as grass growth, drying winds, stored fodder, machinery movement and access limitations combine to create a more complex risk profile than a standard rural home policy can address. - read more

Why Repair Bottlenecks Matter for Farm Insurance Claims

02 Sep 2026: Paige Estritori

Fresh industry concern about repair delays after severe weather is highly relevant for Australian farms, where a damaged shed, washed-out access track or unavailable part can quickly interrupt day-to-day operations. While the wider insurance discussion often focuses on homes and commercial buildings, the same pressure points can be even more complex on rural properties because assets are spread out, specialist equipment is involved and local contractor availability may be limited. - read more

Click for more Insurance News