Victorian Court Sets Legal Cost Boundaries in IAG Class Action Suit

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

Justice Nichols highlighted that the approved group costs order, which encapsulates GST, presents a safeguard for plaintiffs by securing a definitive portion of the settlements. This structure notably lessens the financial risks plaintiffs undertake, as their compensation remains insulated from disproportionate legal fees. This fixed fee measure is especially appealing given the unpredictable and often extensive legal costs that come with protracted class action battles.

Representing the group members, Damian Norris filed the application for the group costs order, a modality that spells out the legal reimbursement to the attorneys that is bound to a fixed percentage of the settlement figure. Particularly for this case, the issue at hand was IAG's alleged misuse of outdated Quarantine Act wordings in its business interruption policies, which did not account for COVID-19 related claims – a significant oversight leading to investor loss.

The order has resonated within legal confines of the financial industry, indicating IAG's peripheral involvement with the matter. While IAG showed a neutral stance towards the costs order application, their primary focus remains on confronting the accusations of misleading conduct and inadequate informative disclosure, as claimed by the litigants.

In the intricate dance of legal actions, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan orchestrates the motion against IAG, lodged back in 2022, with the insurer resolute in contesting the allegations. Drawn under the scrutiny are claims that IAG misrepresented its financial position and failed to uphold continuous disclosure guidelines, potentially inflating its share value and leading stakeholders to err in their investment decisions between March 11 and November 20, 2020.

This legal development signals a shift towards increased equity and fairness for the claimants embroiled in class actions. Moreover, it promotes the efficient deployment of legal resources and stands as a deterrent to unnecessary escalation in legal fees. The class action encompasses those investors who engaged with the market within the specified period, and as the proceedings unravel, the ruling sets a precedent on managing costs in collective legal pursuits.

Published:Friday, 1st Mar 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

What Cyclone Alfred Recovery Teaches Farmers About Insurance

16 Sep 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent industry attention on insurance claims linked to ex-Tropical Cyclone Alfred is a timely reminder that severe weather losses rarely stop at damaged buildings. For farms across storm and flood-exposed regions, the real cost of an event can include cut access roads, damaged fencing, spoiled fodder, machinery downtime, livestock movement issues and weeks of operational disruption. - read more

Seasonal Bushfire Risk Puts Farm Cover Back in the Spotlight

09 Sep 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia’s latest seasonal bushfire outlook is a practical reminder that fire risk is not confined to the height of summer. For many farms, the exposure begins well before a catastrophic fire day is declared, as grass growth, drying winds, stored fodder, machinery movement and access limitations combine to create a more complex risk profile than a standard rural home policy can address. - read more

Why Repair Bottlenecks Matter for Farm Insurance Claims

02 Sep 2026: Paige Estritori

Fresh industry concern about repair delays after severe weather is highly relevant for Australian farms, where a damaged shed, washed-out access track or unavailable part can quickly interrupt day-to-day operations. While the wider insurance discussion often focuses on homes and commercial buildings, the same pressure points can be even more complex on rural properties because assets are spread out, specialist equipment is involved and local contractor availability may be limited. - read more

Insurance Tax Debate Puts Farm Premiums Back in Focus

26 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori

Renewed industry pressure to reduce insurance taxes has put affordability back in the spotlight for rural and regional Australia. The latest debate centres on the extra costs added to insurance through state-based duties, levies and other charges, which can make already expensive cover harder to maintain for households and businesses exposed to flood, bushfire, storm and cyclone risk. - read more

Why Claims Disputes Should Prompt a Farm Insurance Review

19 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent complaints data from the Australian Financial Complaints Authority has again highlighted a pressure point that matters to rural Australia: insurance claims can become difficult when expectations, policy wording and evidence do not line up. While the figures cover the wider insurance market rather than farms alone, the themes are highly relevant for agricultural businesses dealing with storm damage, fire losses, machinery failures, fencing repairs or interrupted operations. - read more

Wetter Weather Forecast Puts Rural Cover Under the Microscope

12 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia's latest seasonal weather signals have again pushed rainfall risk into the foreground for rural and regional businesses. While conditions vary sharply between districts, a wetter outlook for parts of the country is a useful reminder that risk planning should not wait until paddocks are already saturated, creek crossings are cut or machinery is bogged at harvest. - read more

Click for more Insurance News