Insurers Accused of Exploiting Loyalty

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The lawsuit, representing customers of SGIO, RACV, and SGIC, alleges that these insurers promised loyalty and multi-policy discounts but ultimately charged higher base premiums. The deceptive practices purportedly stemmed from a computer algorithm designed to manipulate loyalty metrics.

Slater and Gordon’s Ben Hardwick revealed that this algorithm, which ought to favor longstanding clients, actually penalized them. According to Hardwick, “We’re alleging millions of Australians paid higher premiums yearly on the illusion of discounts, when new customers often enjoyed lower rates.”

This pricing tactic leveraged a customer's perceived likelihood to remain with the insurer even as prices rose. Hardwick explained, “Loyal customers, misjudged as having low price sensitivity, faced steeper price hikes compared to others leaning towards switching providers.”

As a result, many long-term policyholders, unaware of the true extent of their premiums, couldn’t make informed decisions regarding their insurance costs. “They would've likely secured cheaper policies had their loyalty not been factored into the pricing algorithm,” Hardwick added.

The broader implication is substantial as household insurance remains one of the significant annual expenses. It is profoundly disappointing for these customers to see their loyalty rewarded with higher charges, ultimately perceived as unlawful profiteering. The legal move aims to gain compensation for adversely affected customers.

Angela Williams, an RACV policyholder for over two decades, echoed the sentiments, saying, “I thought I was securing good deals. Knowing the involvement of a pricing algorithm manipulating my premiums because of my loyalty is shocking.” Similarly, Debra Dawson, a 16-year-long SGIO client, forgone comparative shopping believing her discounts were exclusive benefits. “Had I known, I would’ve considered alternatives,” she remarked.

IAG, responding to these charges, assured that these practices were already under scrutiny due to a previous legal challenge by ASIC. A spokesperson stated, “We uphold we have honored our loyalty commitments and will defend against this class action, striving to continually provide reliable service to our customers.”

This case underscores the delicate balance of customer loyalty and ethical business practices, highlighting how crucial transparency is for consumer protections in the complex field of financial services.

Published:Friday, 31st May 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

NRMA's Departure from Farm Insurance: What It Means for Australian Farmers

16 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

In a significant shift within the Australian insurance landscape, NRMA has announced its withdrawal from the farm insurance market, ceasing the sale of new policies as of July 1, 2025. This decision affects both Hobby Farm Insurance and Rural Farm Insurance offerings, leaving many farmers in search of alternative coverage options to safeguard their livelihoods. - read more

New Partnership Strengthens Risk Management in Australia's Protected Cropping Sector

16 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Protected Cropping Australia (PCA) and Achmea Farm Insurance have announced a strategic partnership aimed at bolstering risk mitigation and resilience within Australia's protected cropping sector. This collaboration seeks to empower growers by providing tailored insurance solutions and promoting best practices in risk management. - read more

ABARES Report Highlights Insurance as a Key Tool for Managing Agricultural Risks

16 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES) has released a comprehensive report examining the role of insurance as a risk management tool for Australian farmers. The report emphasises that while insurance cannot protect against inevitable events like climate change, it can be instrumental in managing the variability and unpredictability inherent in farming. - read more

ABARES Forecasts Significant Decline in Australian Farm Profits

09 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES) has released a report forecasting a substantial decline in broadacre farm profits, projecting a 70% decrease to approximately $65,000 per farm. This downturn is attributed to escalating input costs and persistent drought conditions affecting various regions. - read more

Low Adoption of Cyber Insurance Among Australian Farmers

09 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent research from WFI Insurance reveals that only 25% of Australian farmers are considering cyber insurance, despite approximately 80% of farms now utilising some form of agricultural technology (agri-tech). This disparity highlights a significant vulnerability within the sector, as increased digitisation exposes farms to potential cyber threats. - read more

Integrating Sustainability into Farm Risk Management Strategies

09 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

In the face of increasing climate variability, Australian agriculture is shifting its approach by integrating sustainability into core risk management strategies. This evolution reflects a broader recognition that environmental stewardship is intrinsically linked to the resilience and long-term viability of farming operations. - read more

Click for more Insurance News