IAG Faces New Allegations Amid Loyalty Pricing Scandal

2

The class action primarily concerns renewals under the RACV, SGIO, and SGIC brands—already subjects of a Federal Court case initiated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), which IAG is also disputing.

Slater and Gordon indicate that over 1 million policyholders renewed their insurance with these brands during the six-year period under scrutiny. The firm believes the class action might result in financial compensation reaching millions of dollars.

The allegation from the law firm centers around claims that IAG engaged in deceptive and unconscionable practices. Customers were purportedly led to believe they were receiving loyalty discounts, while they may have been paying inflated base premiums, effectively nullifying the promised reductions.

According to Ben Hardwick, the leader of the class actions practice at Slater and Gordon, a sophisticated pricing algorithm used by IAG determined customers' likelihood of switching insurers. Those likely to stay with their existing insurer were allegedly subjected to higher premium increases.

"Loyal customers believed they were benefitting from discounts when, in reality, their base premiums were increased before any discount was applied," Hardwick explained. "Given that home and contents insurance is a significant expense for many Australians, the notion that loyal customers were possibly exploited in this manner is particularly troubling."

IAG, for its part, denies these allegations. The company stated that its subsidiaries, Insurance Australia Ltd (IAL) and Insurance Manufacturers of Australia (IMA), have delivered on all loyalty discount promises and maintained that they did not mislead customers about the scope of these discounts.

"Both IAL and IMA will vigorously defend the claims brought forth by Slater and Gordon," the company declared.

The contested policies, provided by RACV, SGIO, and SGIC, covered customers in Victoria, Western Australia, and South Australia, respectively. In addition, Slater and Gordon are investigating similar issues with NRMA Insurance, which operates in every state except Victoria.

ASIC's Federal Court case targets policies issued under the SGIO and SGIC brands between August 2017 and January 2023, and RACV policies from August 2017 to August 2023. A case management hearing is set for October 3.

Last year, ASIC identified misleading pricing promises in the insurance sector as an enforcement priority after discovering that many companies lacked adequate systems to ensure they honored their commitments to customers.

In June of the previous year, the Federal Court fined IAG $40 million for failing to uphold discount promises for NRMA-branded policies. Such policies included motor, home, boat, and caravan insurance, and involved a price "cupping mechanism."

Additionally, the court fined RACQ $10 million in November for potentially misleading disclosures regarding available discounts in certain product statements.

According to an ASIC report from June last year, insurers were expected to remit over $815 million to more than 5.6 million consumers stemming from pricing failures identified and reported since January 2018. This involved over 6.5 million policies.

Published:Monday, 3rd Jun 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

National Climate Risk Assessment Unveils Growing Insurance Challenges

17 Sep 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian government has unveiled its inaugural National Climate Risk Assessment alongside a comprehensive National Adaptation Plan, highlighting the heightened impact of natural disasters on insurance accessibility across the nation. With an urgent call to action, the government acknowledges the impending climate threats and commits to intensifying efforts towards emission reduction. - read more

ASIC Extends Relief on Distribution Rules for Insurance Providers

16 Sep 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has announced an extension of the exemption allowing general insurance providers to forego appointing product distributors as authorised representatives. This decision comes with the introduction of a new legislative instrument, 2025/520, which renews the previous framework, originally established under instrument 2015/682. The relief will now continue until August 27, 2030. - read more

Cyber Insurance Becomes Essential Amid Rising Digital Threats

12 Sep 2025: Paige Estritori

The recent cyberattack on Fortnum Private Wealth, accompanied by ASIC's legal action, has spotlighted the critical risks cyber threats pose to financial advice companies in Australia. With digital integration intensifying across the finance sector, the owner of Fortnum, Entireti, plans to defend the case, underscoring the necessity for ongoing vigilance in cybersecurity measures. - read more

Swiss Re Foresees Rising Premiums Amid Increasing Global Risks

10 Sep 2025: Paige Estritori

In a comprehensive analysis, Swiss Re Institute predicts that global property and casualty insurance premiums will rise in tandem with GDP over the upcoming decade. This growth is driven by amplified natural catastrophe losses, asset accumulation, and heightened economic and litigation claims inflation. The institute's report outlines the evolving insurance landscape amid increasing global risks. - read more

Insurance Council of Australia Assists NSW Flood Claimants

09 Sep 2025: Paige Estritori

In response to the devastating floods that swept across New South Wales' Mid North Coast in May, the Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) is taking proactive steps to support the affected residents. Insurers, organised by the ICA, will be meeting with flood victims in Kempsey, Taree, and Port Macquarie to provide guidance and support as they navigate their insurance claims. - read more

Ombudsman Upholds Policyholder’s Claim Despite Fraud Allegations

08 Sep 2025: Paige Estritori

A motor insurance policyholder has won a significant dispute over fraud allegations, with the industry ombudsman ruling in favour of a payout following a controversial car accident claim. The case revolved around an incident where the claimant's wife crashed at an intersection one evening, reportedly failing to yield. The lack of photographic evidence due to shock and subsequent involvement of towing services complicated matters. - read more

Click for more Insurance News