A Vintage Car Owner Faces Claims Rejection After Repair Nightmare

2

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The Pontiac, originally purchased from the United States in 2014, was in need of refurbishment to restore its former glory by 2021. In December of that year, the car owner approached a repair shop, designated here as Shop N, which provided a restoration estimate of $12,000. Little did he know that this choice would lead him down a troublesome path.

By July 2022, the owner became increasingly frustrated with the lack of progress on his vehicle. In an effort to reclaim his car, he arranged for a former employee of Shop N, referred to here as Shop C, to retrieve the vehicle. However, he claimed that Shop N refused to release the car, leading him to lodge a theft report with his insurance company, SGUAS.

In a strange twist, the owner later revealed to SGUAS that the vehicle had indeed been found. He stated that Shop C had taken the car after allegedly threatening the repair shop's owner. With the car in Shop C’s possession, the owner paid $6,000 for necessary repairs, believing his vehicle was in capable hands.

Despite assurances that work was progressing smoothly, the owner’s confidence waned when he could not ascertain the storage location of his car. When he visited Shop C’s facility in March 2023, he was informed that his vehicle was unavailable, sparking another theft report when communication broke down.

As investigations unfolded, it became apparent that Shop C had stored the Pontiac in a paid location but had failed to prevent damage from corrosion and missing parts. The insurer SGUAS ultimately denied the owner’s claims, asserting the circumstances did not qualify as theft. They reasoned that since the owner had permitted both Shop N and Shop C to handle his vehicle, it could not be considered stolen.

This ruling, released by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), clarified that while the claim was rooted in distressing events, it did not meet the criteria for theft as defined under the insurance policy. Both repairers were found to have inadequate responses to queries regarding the car's condition, but AFCA concluded that the owner's authorization to the repairers negated the theft claim.

“It is not clear whether the damage is malicious or just a byproduct of negligence,” AFCA detailed in its findings. The report indicated that Shop C, after disassembling parts of the vehicle, exhibited an inability or unwillingness to complete the repairs, further complicating the ordeal.

The AFCA noted, “The situation is significant and distressing for the claimant,” nonetheless confirming that the terms of the insurance policy would not cover the circumstances described. Insurance experts recommend that vehicle owners conduct thorough due diligence before committing to a repair shop, ensuring clear agreements and regular updates throughout the repair process.

For classic car enthusiasts, these cases serve as a stark reminder of the complexities involved in restoration work and the critical importance of safeguarding their investments through comprehensive insurance knowledge and proactive communication with service providers.

Source: Insurance News Magazine

Published:Tuesday, 31st Dec 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

WFI Insurance Joins Forces with Farmsafe Australia to Boost Farm Safety Standards

16 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

In a significant move to enhance safety within the Australian agricultural sector, WFI Insurance has announced a partnership with Farmsafe Australia. This collaboration is designed to raise awareness about farming hazards and advocate for the adoption of safer work practices among farmers. - read more

Argis Underwriting Partners with Pacific International to Expand Farm Insurance Offerings

16 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

Argis Underwriting has announced a new partnership with Newcastle-based Pacific International Insurance, enabling the company to resume offering farm insurance coverage across Australia. This development comes after Argis ceased providing new business and renewal terms on its Farm Extra Insurance in April, following the conclusion of a five-year arrangement with HDI Global Specialty. - read more

WFI Insurance Reports Significant Decline in Farm Liability Claims

16 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

WFI Insurance has reported a notable decrease in farm liability claims across most categories, signaling a positive trend in safety practices within the Australian agricultural sector. The insurer observed a 75% reduction in falls from height over the past year, alongside a 30% decline in impact injuries, marking the lowest level in four years. - read more

WFI Insurance Rewards Sustainable Farming with Premium Discounts

08 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

In a significant move towards promoting sustainable agriculture, WFI Insurance has announced a new initiative offering premium discounts to farmers who obtain AgCarE certification. This program, developed by AgForce, aims to recognise and reward farmers implementing eco-friendly practices on their properties. - read more

IAG and Ag Guard Forge Partnership to Elevate Crop Insurance for Australian Farmers

08 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

In a significant development for Australia's agricultural sector, Insurance Australia Group (IAG) has announced a strategic partnership with Ag Guard, a specialist rural underwriting agency. This collaboration will see Ag Guard managing the underwriting for IAG-owned CGU and WFI's crop insurance portfolios starting June next year. - read more

AFCA Mandates Higher Payout for Farmers in Flood Damage Dispute

08 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has recently ruled in favour of a farming group, mandating that insurer Achmea increase its payout for flood damage claims. This decision underscores the critical importance of thorough and expert assessments in the insurance claims process. - read more

Click for more Insurance News