A Vintage Car Owner Faces Claims Rejection After Repair Nightmare

2

The Pontiac, originally purchased from the United States in 2014, was in need of refurbishment to restore its former glory by 2021. In December of that year, the car owner approached a repair shop, designated here as Shop N, which provided a restoration estimate of $12,000. Little did he know that this choice would lead him down a troublesome path.

By July 2022, the owner became increasingly frustrated with the lack of progress on his vehicle. In an effort to reclaim his car, he arranged for a former employee of Shop N, referred to here as Shop C, to retrieve the vehicle. However, he claimed that Shop N refused to release the car, leading him to lodge a theft report with his insurance company, SGUAS.

In a strange twist, the owner later revealed to SGUAS that the vehicle had indeed been found. He stated that Shop C had taken the car after allegedly threatening the repair shop's owner. With the car in Shop C’s possession, the owner paid $6,000 for necessary repairs, believing his vehicle was in capable hands.

Despite assurances that work was progressing smoothly, the owner’s confidence waned when he could not ascertain the storage location of his car. When he visited Shop C’s facility in March 2023, he was informed that his vehicle was unavailable, sparking another theft report when communication broke down.

As investigations unfolded, it became apparent that Shop C had stored the Pontiac in a paid location but had failed to prevent damage from corrosion and missing parts. The insurer SGUAS ultimately denied the owner’s claims, asserting the circumstances did not qualify as theft. They reasoned that since the owner had permitted both Shop N and Shop C to handle his vehicle, it could not be considered stolen.

This ruling, released by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), clarified that while the claim was rooted in distressing events, it did not meet the criteria for theft as defined under the insurance policy. Both repairers were found to have inadequate responses to queries regarding the car's condition, but AFCA concluded that the owner's authorization to the repairers negated the theft claim.

“It is not clear whether the damage is malicious or just a byproduct of negligence,” AFCA detailed in its findings. The report indicated that Shop C, after disassembling parts of the vehicle, exhibited an inability or unwillingness to complete the repairs, further complicating the ordeal.

The AFCA noted, “The situation is significant and distressing for the claimant,” nonetheless confirming that the terms of the insurance policy would not cover the circumstances described. Insurance experts recommend that vehicle owners conduct thorough due diligence before committing to a repair shop, ensuring clear agreements and regular updates throughout the repair process.

For classic car enthusiasts, these cases serve as a stark reminder of the complexities involved in restoration work and the critical importance of safeguarding their investments through comprehensive insurance knowledge and proactive communication with service providers.

Source: Insurance News Magazine

Published:Tuesday, 31st Dec 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

National Climate Risk Assessment Unveils Growing Insurance Challenges

17 Sep 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian government has unveiled its inaugural National Climate Risk Assessment alongside a comprehensive National Adaptation Plan, highlighting the heightened impact of natural disasters on insurance accessibility across the nation. With an urgent call to action, the government acknowledges the impending climate threats and commits to intensifying efforts towards emission reduction. - read more

ASIC Extends Relief on Distribution Rules for Insurance Providers

16 Sep 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has announced an extension of the exemption allowing general insurance providers to forego appointing product distributors as authorised representatives. This decision comes with the introduction of a new legislative instrument, 2025/520, which renews the previous framework, originally established under instrument 2015/682. The relief will now continue until August 27, 2030. - read more

Cyber Insurance Becomes Essential Amid Rising Digital Threats

12 Sep 2025: Paige Estritori

The recent cyberattack on Fortnum Private Wealth, accompanied by ASIC's legal action, has spotlighted the critical risks cyber threats pose to financial advice companies in Australia. With digital integration intensifying across the finance sector, the owner of Fortnum, Entireti, plans to defend the case, underscoring the necessity for ongoing vigilance in cybersecurity measures. - read more

Swiss Re Foresees Rising Premiums Amid Increasing Global Risks

10 Sep 2025: Paige Estritori

In a comprehensive analysis, Swiss Re Institute predicts that global property and casualty insurance premiums will rise in tandem with GDP over the upcoming decade. This growth is driven by amplified natural catastrophe losses, asset accumulation, and heightened economic and litigation claims inflation. The institute's report outlines the evolving insurance landscape amid increasing global risks. - read more

Insurance Council of Australia Assists NSW Flood Claimants

09 Sep 2025: Paige Estritori

In response to the devastating floods that swept across New South Wales' Mid North Coast in May, the Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) is taking proactive steps to support the affected residents. Insurers, organised by the ICA, will be meeting with flood victims in Kempsey, Taree, and Port Macquarie to provide guidance and support as they navigate their insurance claims. - read more

Ombudsman Upholds Policyholder’s Claim Despite Fraud Allegations

08 Sep 2025: Paige Estritori

A motor insurance policyholder has won a significant dispute over fraud allegations, with the industry ombudsman ruling in favour of a payout following a controversial car accident claim. The case revolved around an incident where the claimant's wife crashed at an intersection one evening, reportedly failing to yield. The lack of photographic evidence due to shock and subsequent involvement of towing services complicated matters. - read more

Click for more Insurance News