Insured Value Disputes: A Closer Look at Claims Resolution

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

Following the claim submission under his home and contents policy, QBE offered to arrange a replacement through a designated jeweler, referred to as Jeweler P. However, the claimant sought a cash settlement instead, prompting QBE to offer $15,048, which reflected the jeweler’s estimate for a suitable substitute.

Frustrated with the compensation amount, the claimant requested the full insured value, raising concerns about the jeweler's qualifications and output quality. This scenario highlights a crucial issue: the perceived mismatch between insured sums and actual claim settlements.

According to the ruling by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), the determination of the claimant's compensation was chiefly based on the actual replacement costs rather than the insured amount or premium that had been paid. “The relevant consideration for the purposes of the complainant’s claim is the actual cost the insurer would incur to replace the necklace,” stated AFCA’s ombudsman.

Adding to the complexity, the claimant expressed doubts regarding Jeweler P's capabilities, citing a negative review dated two years prior. Although AFCA acknowledged the claimant’s concerns about the jeweler's reputation and his belief that the suggested replacement was subpar, these factors did not adequately justify a demand for the full insured amount. The ombudsman concluded, “I am not satisfied these matters entitle the complainant to the outcome he seeks.”

In a further analysis, it was revealed that there were discrepancies in the valuation of the necklace. While the insured necklace weighed approximately 156 grams, Jeweler P’s quote was based on a 150-gram estimate. Following this, AFCA indicated that QBE should reassess the replacement cost to align with the revised details provided by the claimant.

AFCA also denied the claimant's request for additional compensation, emphasizing that many of the delays were predominantly due to his insistence on a resolution that was beyond the policy's provisions. This case underscores the importance of understanding both the terms of an insurance policy and the mechanisms of claims processes, especially when expectations revolve around the insured values of personal property.

This incident serves as a reminder for policyholders: the sum insured may not always equate to the cash settlement in the event of a loss, and insurers are likely to adhere strictly to the actual replacement costs as outlined in policy agreements. To navigate such disputes effectively, clear communication and precise documentation during the claims process are imperative.

Details of this case were shared by Insurance News Magazine, shedding light on the finer points of insurance claims involving high-value personal items.

Published:Monday, 6th Jan 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Learning from Near Misses: Enhancing Farm Safety in Australia

18 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

In July 2025, Farmsafe Australia launched the 'Second Chances - Who Knows How Many You'll Get' campaign, aiming to transform near misses on farms into learning opportunities to prevent future accidents. This initiative underscores the critical importance of recognising and addressing close calls in agricultural settings. - read more

WFI's 2025 Farm Accident Insights: A Call for Enhanced Safety Measures

18 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

In October 2025, WFI Insurance unveiled its annual farm accident insights as part of Farmsafe Australia's 2025 Safer Farms Report. The findings paint a stark picture of the challenges facing Australian agriculture, with 2024 recording 72 farm-related deaths-the highest in over two decades. - read more

Strengthening Agricultural Insurance: Rural Affinity and Munich Re's Renewed Partnership

10 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

Rural Affinity has renewed its partnership with Munich Re Specialty - Global Markets under a new five-year agreement, continuing a collaboration that began in 2006. This renewed alliance aims to support Rural Affinity's efforts to expand its agricultural insurance offerings across Australia and introduce new products leveraging technology and innovation. - read more

WFI Insurance and Rural Aid Join Forces to Assist Farmers in Crisis

02 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

In a significant move to bolster support for Australia's agricultural sector, WFI Insurance has announced a formal partnership with Rural Aid, a leading rural relief charity. This collaboration is set to provide much-needed assistance to farmers and rural communities affected by recent natural disasters, including the devastating bushfires in Victoria and severe weather events in Queensland. - read more

Elders Insurance Warns Farmers of Escalating Summer Storm Threats

02 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

As the Australian summer approaches, Elders Insurance is calling on farmers to brace for an anticipated increase in storm-related damages. Recent claims data reveals a concerning trend, with summer months accounting for nearly half of all storm-related farm insurance property claims over the past two years. - read more

Significant Reduction in Farm Liability Claims Reflects Enhanced Safety Practices

25 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent data from WFI Insurance indicates a substantial 75% decrease in farm liability claims over the past year, suggesting that Australian farmers are adopting more effective safety measures. This decline is particularly notable in incidents involving falls from height, which have reached their lowest level in four years. - read more

Click for more Insurance News