Insured Value Disputes: A Closer Look at Claims Resolution

3

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

Following the claim submission under his home and contents policy, QBE offered to arrange a replacement through a designated jeweler, referred to as Jeweler P. However, the claimant sought a cash settlement instead, prompting QBE to offer $15,048, which reflected the jeweler’s estimate for a suitable substitute.

Frustrated with the compensation amount, the claimant requested the full insured value, raising concerns about the jeweler's qualifications and output quality. This scenario highlights a crucial issue: the perceived mismatch between insured sums and actual claim settlements.

According to the ruling by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), the determination of the claimant's compensation was chiefly based on the actual replacement costs rather than the insured amount or premium that had been paid. “The relevant consideration for the purposes of the complainant’s claim is the actual cost the insurer would incur to replace the necklace,” stated AFCA’s ombudsman.

Adding to the complexity, the claimant expressed doubts regarding Jeweler P's capabilities, citing a negative review dated two years prior. Although AFCA acknowledged the claimant’s concerns about the jeweler's reputation and his belief that the suggested replacement was subpar, these factors did not adequately justify a demand for the full insured amount. The ombudsman concluded, “I am not satisfied these matters entitle the complainant to the outcome he seeks.”

In a further analysis, it was revealed that there were discrepancies in the valuation of the necklace. While the insured necklace weighed approximately 156 grams, Jeweler P’s quote was based on a 150-gram estimate. Following this, AFCA indicated that QBE should reassess the replacement cost to align with the revised details provided by the claimant.

AFCA also denied the claimant's request for additional compensation, emphasizing that many of the delays were predominantly due to his insistence on a resolution that was beyond the policy's provisions. This case underscores the importance of understanding both the terms of an insurance policy and the mechanisms of claims processes, especially when expectations revolve around the insured values of personal property.

This incident serves as a reminder for policyholders: the sum insured may not always equate to the cash settlement in the event of a loss, and insurers are likely to adhere strictly to the actual replacement costs as outlined in policy agreements. To navigate such disputes effectively, clear communication and precise documentation during the claims process are imperative.

Details of this case were shared by Insurance News Magazine, shedding light on the finer points of insurance claims involving high-value personal items.

Published:Monday, 6th Jan 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

WFI Insurance Rewards Sustainable Farming with Premium Discounts

08 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

In a significant move towards promoting sustainable agriculture, WFI Insurance has announced a new initiative offering premium discounts to farmers who obtain AgCarE certification. This program, developed by AgForce, aims to recognise and reward farmers implementing eco-friendly practices on their properties. - read more

IAG and Ag Guard Forge Partnership to Elevate Crop Insurance for Australian Farmers

08 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

In a significant development for Australia's agricultural sector, Insurance Australia Group (IAG) has announced a strategic partnership with Ag Guard, a specialist rural underwriting agency. This collaboration will see Ag Guard managing the underwriting for IAG-owned CGU and WFI's crop insurance portfolios starting June next year. - read more

AFCA Mandates Higher Payout for Farmers in Flood Damage Dispute

08 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has recently ruled in favour of a farming group, mandating that insurer Achmea increase its payout for flood damage claims. This decision underscores the critical importance of thorough and expert assessments in the insurance claims process. - read more

WFI Insurance's $250,000 Donation Supports Flood-Affected Queensland Farmers

30 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

In response to the catastrophic flooding that has devastated parts of western Queensland, WFI Insurance has stepped forward with a substantial donation of $250,000 to Rural Aid. This contribution is aimed at bolstering relief efforts for farming communities grappling with the aftermath of the region's most severe floods in half a century. - read more

AFCA Supports Significant Home Insurance Premium Increase Based on Updated Flood Risk Assessment

30 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has recently upheld a substantial increase in home insurance premiums for a property, attributing the rise to updated assessments of flood risk. This decision underscores the critical role of accurate risk evaluation in determining insurance costs and the necessity for property owners to stay informed about potential changes in their risk profiles. - read more

Revolutionising Crop Insurance: DAS Unveils Cutting-Edge Data Tool

22 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

Digital Agriculture Services (DAS) has introduced an innovative crop insurance solution in Australia, leveraging machine learning, automapping, and geospatial data to improve policy accuracy. This tool is designed to assist insurers, underwriters, brokers, and loss adjusters by precisely locating insured paddocks and identifying crop types, yields, and other critical details. - read more

Click for more Insurance News